Politics: Kerry on Style, Bush on Substance

I watched it, and ignored the spin zone afterwards, where each side claims victory. I wanted to see what Americans thought.

The post-debate polls are out from USA Today, and like most Americans, I agree that Kerry was more refined and articulate. (Even though I disagree with most of his talking points). I think Kerry wowed America with his lawyer-like ability to make his case, on his latest reincarnation of opinions.

The problem Kerry is having, is on the substance side. General Tommy Frank came on after the debate, and disputed what Kerry claimed he said. Kerry's plan for Iraq was, well, no plan. His comments on North Korea were troublesome.

It's not surprising to see the following polls:

From USA Today

Style:

Who won the debate? Kerry 53%; Bush 37%
Who expressed himself more clearly? Kerry 60%; Bush 32%

Substance:

Who'd handle Iraq better? Bush 54%; Kerry 43%
Who'd be a better commander-in-chief? Bush 54%; Kerry 44%
Who agrees with you on the issues? Bush 49%; Kerry 46%
Who has a good understanding of the issues? Bush 41%; Kerry 41%
Who was more believable? Bush 50%; Kerry 45%
Who was more likeable? Bush 48%; Kerry 41%
Who is tough enough for the job? Bush 54%; Kerry 37%

The American people have sounded off. Not exactly what Kerry was hoping for, and on the style side, I think Bush would like to see his image there improve...